Dermatology logo

Case Studies:

Guidelines on the Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescents and Adults in South Africa
Werner Sinclair *, Jamila Aboobaker, Francois Jordaan, Deepak Modi and Gail Todd

Objective

The guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis in patients older than 18 years have been developed in an attempt to improve the outcomes of treatment of this condition in South Africa. This condition has a major impact on the quality of life of sufferers and it is expected that these guidelines, if implemented, will play a role in achieving this.

Recommendations

All health care workers involved in the management of atopic dermatitis should take note of these guidelines and try and implement them in clinical practice as far as possible. All treatment methods and procedures not substantiated by evidence from the literature should be discontinued and avoided to decrease the financial burden of dermatitis treatment.

Validation

These guidelines were developed through general consensus by a group of five South African dermatologists, from evidence based on extensive literature review. Draft documents were made available for comment to the dermatology community as a whole, via the official web site of the Dermatological Society of South Africa. A series of discussions were held in the six largest centres in the country, attended by the majority of South African dermatologists. All input from these sources, where appropriate, were then incorporated into these guidelines.

Guidelines sponsor

Novartis initiated the project and sponsored the meetings of the work group and all costs generated by these meetings.

Disclaimer

These guidelines do not represent all the possible methods of management applicable to all patients, do not exclude any other reasonable methods and will not ensure successful treatment in every situation. The unique circumstances of each patient should be taken into account by the responsible physician regarding decisions on any specific therapy.

(*Chair of Work Group)
Introduction and Methods
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a very common, chronic, inflammatory eczematous skin disease in children, affecting up to 20 percent of children in Western Europe and Australia. The morbidity and impact on quality of life of these patients can be very severe . Women seem to be more severely affected than men and the psychological distress suffered correlates well with the severity of the dermatitis .

There is considerable confusion about uniform criteria for the diagnosis of AD in adults and management if often arbitrary and emperical, with poor outcomes in general. There is therefore a need for standardized guidelines on diagnosing and managing this condition.

A work group of dermatologists, the current full time heads of Dermatology departments / divisions of five of the medical schools in South Africa, were convened on instruction from the executive committee of the Dermatological Society of South Africa and tasked with publishing these guidelines.

The work group used an evidence-based module, evidence obtained through a thorough literature search on the topic over the last 15 years. Evidence was graded according to the SIGN grading system and all recommendations and statements in the text are marked according to these levels of evidence to denote the strength of evidence and therefore the validity and weight of recommendation:

Levels of evidence:

1++ High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials
(RCTs), or RCTs with very low risk of bias
1+ Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with low
risk of bias.
1- Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias
2++ High quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies; high quality
case-control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias or chance
and a high probability that the relationship is causal.
2+ Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding, bias
or chance and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal.
2- Case-control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding, bias or chance and
a significant risk that the relationship is not causal.
   
3 Non-analytical studies, e.g. case reports, case series.
   
4 Expert opinion

Grades of recommendation:

A At least one meta-analysis, systematic review or RCTs rated as 1++ and directly applicable to the target population; or A systematic review of RCTs or a body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results.
   
B A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+
   
C A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++
   
D Evidence level 3 or 4; or
Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+
   
O Not recommendable
Scope
These guidelines were developed to address the diagnosis and management of adult patients, at the ages of 13 years and above, who suffers from atopic dermatitis.


  1. Evers AW, Duller P, Van der Valk PG, Kraaimaat FW, Van de Kerkhof PC. Common burden of chronic diseases? Contributors to psychological distress in adults with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2005;152(6):1275-81

  2. Holm EA, Esmann S, Jemec GB. Does visible atopic dermatitis affect quality of life more in women than in men? Gend Med 2004;1(2):125-30

  3. Taieb C, Ngyuen C, Myon E. Adults with atopic dermatitis: Quality of life impact. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54(3):AB80

  4. SIGN 50. A Guideline Developers Handbook. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guideline Development Methods. 2004;7.5-7.8

GALDERMA
Copyright 2012 Dermatology | Website terms of use | Privacy Policy Admin
Powered By
E2